Trump Wants to Own Money
Is this the biggest financial heist in modern American history?
A quick note: I keep all of my work free to read because I believe open access matters right now. But I depend on paid subscriptions and donations to continue writing. If this analysis helps you see things more clearly, your support keeps the work alive. You can also send a tip on Venmo @joycestrong — every bit helps me continue researching and publishing in real time.
Most people still think the Trump crypto story is about meme coins, speculation and grift.
It is bigger than that.
Much bigger.
Trump wants to own money.
Not by printing dollars at the Federal Reserve.
By positioning his family inside the infrastructure through which digital dollars move, settle and generate profit.
Imagine if, during the birth of modern banking, the sitting president’s family had quietly acquired ownership stakes in the private rails through which dollars moved around the world — while simultaneously helping write the laws governing those rails.
That is the scale of what critics fear may be happening right now.
That distinction matters because politicians and media figures keep throwing Bitcoin, stablecoins, exchanges, meme coins, decentralized finance and criminal laundering into one giant rhetorical pile.
And because of that, millions of people stopped listening.
But this part should make every American stop and pay attention.
What Stablecoins Actually Are
The Trump family is tied to World Liberty Financial, the company behind the stablecoin USD1.
Donald Trump and his sons publicly promoted World Liberty Financial during its launch, and according to public reporting, Trump family entities receive substantial economic participation from the project.
A stablecoin is a digital token designed to maintain a fixed value against the U.S. dollar, typically backed by reserves like Treasury bills, repo assets and cash equivalents.
Stablecoins are not Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is decentralized. Nobody controls issuance once the protocol exists.
Stablecoins are different.
A private issuer creates them
A private issuer holds the reserves
A private issuer earns the yield
A private issuer captures the network effects
A private issuer gains leverage if the stablecoin becomes globally dominant
Meme coins are speculative casino chips.
Stablecoins are infrastructure.
That distinction changes everything.
Stablecoins touch:
Treasury markets
payment rails
cross-border settlement systems
banking deposits
and potentially the future architecture of digital commerce itself
Supporters of stablecoins believe they could strengthen long-term global demand for U.S. dollars by spreading dollar-denominated digital assets across international commerce.
Stablecoins are not merely speculative assets. Supporters see them as the foundation for:
faster global payments
programmable finance
twenty-four-hour settlement systems
cross-border digital commerce
That is why banks, governments and technology investors are all fighting over who will control the infrastructure beneath them.
Stablecoins could create parallel financial infrastructure operating partly outside traditional banking channels and some of the political friction points governments historically used to monitor global capital flows.
That is where this story changes from “crypto” into something far more serious:
A sitting president and his family positioning themselves inside the future plumbing of digital finance.
If widely adopted, stablecoins could become digital toll roads for dollars.
Trump appears to want his family standing at the tollbooth.
The Crypto Trilogy
Congress, with strong White House support, has now assembled what amounts to a trilogy of crypto legislation:
The GENIUS Act — now law, creating the first federal framework for stablecoins
The CLARITY Act — defining which digital assets fall under SEC versus CFTC oversight
The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act — designed to prohibit a retail Federal Reserve central bank digital currency
Taken together, these bills are helping shape the next era of American digital finance.
At the same time private stablecoins are being legitimized, a government-issued digital dollar is being politically blocked.
And at the exact same moment Washington is writing these rules, the sitting president’s family has direct financial interests connected to the industry being regulated.
That should stop the conversation cold.
Because the issue is no longer whether crypto should exist.
The issue is whether the President of the United States should be allowed to financially benefit from the creation of a new financial system while influencing the laws governing it.
Every regulatory decision that increases the legitimacy, adoption or scale of stablecoins could indirectly increase the value and strategic importance of president-linked crypto ventures already operating inside that market.
The Stablecoin Power Struggle
The stablecoin market is already a global power struggle between:
offshore giants like Tether’s USDT
more institutionally aligned issuers like Circle’s USDC
and now politically connected entrants like World Liberty’s USD1
World Liberty’s USD1 is attempting to enter that geopolitical and financial battlefield with the direct branding power of the Trump family behind it.
Why the CLARITY Act Matters
The CLARITY Act matters because it would shift large parts of the crypto industry away from the stricter investor-protection framework traditionally enforced by the SEC and toward the more commodity-focused oversight structure of the CFTC.
The SEC traditionally operates under stricter disclosure and investor-protection rules designed for securities markets.
The CFTC, while still a serious regulator, has historically taken a lighter-touch approach focused more on commodities trading and market integrity.
Many crypto firms prefer CFTC oversight because it is generally viewed as:
more industry-friendly
less aggressive
and less disclosure-heavy than the SEC
Critics argue the CLARITY Act could allow large parts of the crypto industry to migrate away from tougher SEC scrutiny into a more permissive regulatory environment just as politically connected players are entering the market at enormous scale.
The Binance and UAE Connection
Reuters reported that World Liberty’s USD1 stablecoin was selected for a massive Abu Dhabi-backed investment transaction involving Binance.
Binance matters here because it is not a niche crypto startup.
It is one of the largest global crypto exchanges in the world and has already faced years of international regulatory scrutiny, enforcement actions and massive settlements tied to compliance failures.
So when a president-linked stablecoin becomes tied to a sovereign-scale Binance transaction involving foreign capital, people should pay attention.
Read that sentence again slowly.
Foreign capital
President-linked stablecoin
Global exchange infrastructure
U.S. monetary influence
All connected together.
The Eric Trump Questions
And this is where scrutiny surrounding Eric Trump and World Liberty Financial intensified this week.
According to reporting by The Wall Street Journal and others, a UAE-linked investment structure associated with Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan — the powerful Emirati national security adviser sometimes nicknamed the “Spy Sheikh” — quietly acquired a major ownership position connected to World Liberty Financial shortly before Trump returned to office.
Critics argue the arrangement was extraordinary because it appeared to combine:
foreign state-linked capital
opaque ownership structures
president-linked financial infrastructure
ongoing U.S. regulatory negotiations
and direct economic benefit tied to the Trump family
The controversy now centers on whether foreign investment relationships and ownership structures tied to World Liberty Financial were sufficiently disclosed under applicable laws, ethics requirements and regulatory frameworks.
If foreign-linked ownership stakes, investment relationships or material financial interests tied to World Liberty Financial were intentionally concealed or improperly disclosed where disclosure was legally required, that could raise serious legal and regulatory issues deserving formal investigation.
And because the project involves individuals connected to the family of a sitting president — including Trump family associates and World Liberty co-founder Zach Witkoff, son of presidential envoy Steve Witkoff — the ethical concerns become even more extraordinary.
At minimum, the relationships, ownership structures and disclosure obligations involved here deserve aggressive congressional, regulatory and journalistic scrutiny.
That is the real ethical issue.
Not “crypto bad.”
Not “Bitcoin laundering.”
Not generalized panic about blockchain technology.
The issue is whether foreign capital should be allowed to flow into a president-linked private dollar system while Congress simultaneously rewrites the laws governing that system.
Seigniorage and the New Money Rails
The word most Americans have never heard is seigniorage.
Traditionally, seigniorage refers to the profit and power captured by whoever issues money.
Historically, sovereign governments and central banks controlled that function.
Stablecoin issuers are not literally replacing the Federal Reserve, but the structure rhymes with seigniorage in important ways:
they hold massive reserve pools
they earn yield from those reserves
they capture transaction flow
they gain leverage from network adoption
they profit as their private dollar systems scale globally
Under Bretton Woods after 1944, the United States gained enormous global power because the world trusted the dollar.
Trust is the asset.
Trust is what gives reserve-currency status its power.
And whoever controls the rails of that system captures value continuously at global scale.
That is why stablecoins suddenly matter so much to Washington.
Stablecoins are typically backed by:
short-term Treasury bills
repo markets
cash reserves
other highly liquid dollar assets
As stablecoins grow globally, demand for those reserves grows too.
That means private stablecoin issuers could eventually become enormous holders of U.S. government debt.
Now the picture becomes clearer.
This is a geopolitical and monetary-power story.
People around Trump appear to understand that stablecoins may become part of a fourth monetary era:
gold-backed systems
fiat central banking
digital payment networks
privately issued programmable stablecoins
And they do not merely want to participate in that world.
They appear to want an ownership position inside it.
In perpetuity.
If a private dollar rail becomes embedded into global finance, the profit stream does not depend on one election cycle.
It can continue generating value as long as the system keeps using it.
Why This Feels Wrong
Americans instinctively understand that money and political power become dangerous when fused together.
The country was built in part around suspicion of concentrated financial power, central banking influence and private interests capturing public systems.
That instinct is part of why this story feels unsettling even to people who do not fully understand the technology.
The United States government now occupies multiple roles at once:
regulator of stablecoins
beneficiary of increased Treasury demand created by stablecoin reserves
political gatekeeper deciding which forms of digital dollars are allowed to exist
Into that landscape steps a president-linked private issuer seeking market share for its own stablecoin.
That overlap is where the ethics concerns become extraordinary.
A president-linked stablecoin is not merely a financial product.
It can become:
a political network
a branding vehicle
a mechanism for global influence operating alongside formal government power
That is why the ethics issue matters more than generalized anti-crypto rhetoric.
Senator Elizabeth Warren weakens her strongest argument when she lumps Bitcoin, stablecoins, decentralized finance, exchanges and criminal laundering operations into one giant rhetorical bucket.
People immediately tune out because they know those systems are different.
I am not arguing against Bitcoin.
I am arguing against the President of the United States owning a private stake in the future infrastructure of the dollar.
That lands.
Because it is understandable.
And because ordinary Americans instinctively understand that presidents should not be writing rules for industries that enrich their own families.
Especially not industries tied to money itself.
Why Banks Are Panicking
Meanwhile banks are panicking because stablecoins threaten to pull deposits away from the traditional banking system into tokenized dollar networks.
Deposits are the raw material of traditional banking.
If consumers move large amounts of money into stablecoin systems, banks lose:
funding power
lending power
influence
The fight became especially intense around one issue:
Yield.
If stablecoin issuers are allowed to pay interest-like returns, rewards or staking income directly to users, consumers suddenly have a reason to move money out of traditional bank accounts and into digital dollar systems.
That possibility terrified the banking industry.
Crypto companies and lobbyists — including firms like Coinbase — pushed aggressively for frameworks that would allow stablecoins to scale into mainstream finance while avoiding the full regulatory burdens imposed on traditional banks.
Lawmakers eventually moved toward a compromise structure that restricted some forms of passive interest payments while still leaving room for reward mechanisms, staking structures and other crypto-native incentives.
Critics argue the compromise still opens the door for stablecoin systems to compete directly with banks without operating under the same regulatory constraints.
That is part of why the financial industry lobbying war around stablecoins became so intense.
This is not merely a debate about technology.
It is a battle over who gets to control deposits, payments, settlement systems and ultimately the future flow of money itself.
Large-scale private stablecoin systems could eventually complicate how governments monitor liquidity, banking flows and monetary-policy transmission across the financial system.
The financial sector sees what is coming.
Digital dollars
Tokenized assets
Private payment rails
Massive reserve pools invested into Treasury markets
This is no longer a niche tech story.
This is a battle over who controls the future architecture of finance.
The Risk Nobody Wants to Talk About
And history is not reassuring here.
Glass-Steagall was dismantled
Derivatives exploded
Enron happened
The global financial crisis followed
Every era of deregulated financial innovation arrives wrapped in the language of modernization and efficiency.
Until the risks become socialized and the profits remain private.
And there is another question hiding underneath all of this:
What happens during a stablecoin bank run?
If privately issued stablecoins become deeply integrated into Treasury markets and payment systems, a large-scale redemption panic could create liquidity shocks that spread far beyond crypto itself.
History suggests the public often absorbs the downside when privately engineered financial systems break.
That may sound abstract now.
So did derivatives before 2008.
Why Ordinary Americans Should Care
Most Americans are not thinking about stablecoins while paying rent, buying groceries or trying to keep up with bills.
But the architecture being built right now could eventually influence:
how savings move
how payments settle
how banks compete
how political power interacts with money itself
That is why this matters far beyond crypto investors and technology circles.
That is why the stablecoin story matters.
Not because “crypto bad.”
Not because blockchain technology itself is evil.
But because no democracy should sleepwalk into allowing a sitting president and his family to build a private financial tollbooth inside the future infrastructure of global dollar flows while simultaneously influencing the laws governing it.
The line between democratic government and private monetary power is beginning to disappear.
The architecture of the next financial system is already being built.
The question is who gets to own the tollbooth to the future of money.
Join My Team
Independent and unbought — a Word Busker from The Hub, showing up and saying the quiet parts out loud.
Support keeps the lights on and the words flowing — I can’t do this without your support.
You can send a tip on Venmo @joycestrong — every bit helps keep the lights on and the words flowing strong.
Or, if it fits your budget, become a paid subscriber to stand inside the work as it’s being built.
— Joyce.
Dastardly Donald! Must see justice.
For the sake of Americans and the rest of us, I hope ye stop Trump and his co-conspirators.
"The Senate Banking Committee advanced the CLARITY Act 15–9, without an ethics provision, preserving a certification mechanism that could allow World Liberty Financial to seek reclassification of its governance token before it ever answers for the freeze key, the missing disclosures, or the Trump-family money already taken."
https://wlfireside.substack.com/p/the-machine-kept-moving-wlfi-clarity